Covid-19: Why are we so irrational?
Mar 23, 2020
The crisis the world is going through with COVID-19 comes with a set of cognitive biases that account for irrational behaviour. Faced with this unintelligible epidemic, incomplete data and a relatively unknown virus, we fall prey to at least 4 typical biases
Availability heuristic: it’s a mental shortcut that’ll make you rely only on the information you find immediately available, in particular the things you can recall immediately (short-term memory). Under availability heuristic, you tend to base your judgment and form your opinion only on the latest news. And when the latest news is just about COVID-19 all day, it doesn’t help to get perspective. Covid’s virality is matched only by the virality of fake news and controversies. Hard to stay clear-headed.
Survivorship bias: that’s when you draw hasty conclusions from incomplete data. It’ll make you overestimate the chances of an outcome by focusing all your attention on those subjects whose data made it back to you (the “survivors”). In the case of COVID-19, the name of this bias seems very inappropriate because the data that made it to the authorities are overwhelmingly the data from those people whose symptoms are very bad (and who get to see a doctor and get tested), and those who died. As a result, Covid’s mortality rate is likely to be overestimated: we don’t have enough data from people whose symptoms are mild and those who never get tested.
Bandwagon effect: it’s a phenomenon that explains why fads and trends can become viral. The probability of an individual adopting an idea, fad or trend, increases with the proportion of other people who already have. It leads to conformity, as most people get their information from others. At some point, this effect led large numbers of people to start buying face masks because they saw people wearing them, even though the protection it provides is dubious (it’s important to wear one when you know you’re infected). It’s far more important to wash your hands for 20 seconds regularly, avoid touching your face with your hands and avoid physical contact with others. The effect can be positive when it helps spread safe behaviours (like avoiding handshakes).
Normalcy bias: it’s the tendency for people to believe that things will always function normally and underestimate the likelihood of complete unexpected, crazy disaster. That’s why most people fail to adequately prepare for disasters. People and companies display normalcy bias during an unexpected disaster. It leads to inadequate supplies, backup, insurance, etc. It also leads to paralysis and what’s known as the ostrich effect. The opposite is overreaction and worst-case scenario bias. Strangely enough both normalcy and worst-case scenario biases are visible at the same time.
What does it all mean for companies?
It is critical that managers and leaders take the right decisions for their staff and customers. Employers are responsible for their employees’ physical safety and mental well-being. To make the right decisions, they must be aware of those biases and seek as much information as possible. Following official instructions is a start, but it’s often better to err on the side of caution by going beyond what official instructions recommend.
An increased awareness of these biases in a time of crisis could be the perfect opportunity to create new habits and design new health and safety rituals and processes that may be beneficial to minimise other risks after the crisis.
- With appropriate nudges and redesign, toilets could become havens of cleanliness and relaxation.
- Workers should be nudged into washing their hands thoroughly each time they visit the loo.
- Door handles should be disinfected several times a day, but swing doors to access the toilets should be considered (so nobody would have to even touch handles).
- Single use paper towels should be dispensed in the toilets for people to dry their hands safely.
- Antiseptic wipes should be provided to every employee to disinfect smartphone and keyboard.
- Hydroalcoholic hand sanitizing gel should be provided to every employee with no access to soap and water (even momentarily).
- Remote work by default is a good idea beyond Covid-19.
- Questioning unnecessary meetings is also a good habit to keep beyond the current crisis.
More inspiration: Laetitia Vitaud
Future of work author and speaker
Why “bring me solutions, not problems” is a terrible corporate phrase
Future of work expert Laetitia Vitaud takes a swing at a classic (and toxic) part of the managerial dictionary
Feb 23, 2023
What a dash of laziness can do for you
It would never occur to us to criticize an animal for needing sleep, so why do we judge each other so harshly?
Jan 05, 2023
Top Gun: An anti-ageist movie? Not exactly…
The blockbuster sequel shows the cognitive dissonance between what we say about valuing experience and the reality of our workplaces
Oct 06, 2022
Here’s why you don’t need to be irreplaceable at work
Do we want to be considered irreplaceable at work? Sure, it might give us a confidence boost in the moment, but is it worth it in the long run?
Sep 07, 2022
Is period leave really a good idea?
The debate over menstrual leave is growing louder in the US, but is it really a progressive policy?
Jul 27, 2022
Inside the jungle: the HR newsletter
Studies, events, expert analysis, and solutions... Every 2 weeks in your inbox
Are you proud of your corporate culture?
Give it the visibility it deserves.Our solutions