How your memory plays tricks on you | We're all biased
Dec 16, 2019
We humans are not rational beings capable of always putting emotion aside so as to process information and take the best decisions for our company. We are biased. “Cognitive biases” refer to the distortions created by our cognitive system when we receive and process information. When it comes to human resources, these biases have a tremendous impact. Most of us are unaware of them, yet they often hinder diversity and efficiency. With this series, we aim to provide short and insightful articles to help you identify the biases, understand how they affect HR, and what to do to address them. Number 3 : the memory biases.
What is it?
We all know our memory can play tricks on us. A memory bias is a cognitive bias that either enhances or impairs the recall of a memory, or a bias that modifies the content of a memory. Memory is connected to perception: indeed you can only remember what you actually perceived. There are many types of memory biases. Each time you summon a memory, your emotional state may alter its content. There are so many possible distortions, it’s a wonder people keep trusting their memories!
The recency bias refers to the bias that leads many of us to remember more easily something that has happened recently while struggling to remember something that occurred a while back. In the 1960s several researchers conducted studies to test people’s ability to remember lists of words. They concluded that we humans have a short-term and a long-term memory. The recency bias is the short-term bias. But there’s also a long-term bias: the primacy effect results in a person recalling first impressions best. So an individual who reads a long list of words is likely to remember words toward the beginning and toward the end better than words in the middle.
Another memory bias was also brought to light in the 1960s: the mere-exposure effect. It is a phenomenon that’s well known to advertising professionals. People tend to develop a preference for things merely because they feel familiar. The more often you see a person, the more likable you will find that person to be. Last but not least, the hindsight bias, also known as the knew-it-all-along phenomenon, refers to the tendency for people to perceive events that have already occurred as having been more predictable than they actually were before they took place. “I knew it,”, confident people often say. The hindsight bias is a source of overconfidence regarding our ability the predict future outcomes. It denies the role of chance
What does it mean for human resources?
Memory biases are dangerous for recruiters, especially when a recruiting process takes weeks (or months), or when many candidates are seen on the same day. Too often recruiters let their memory play tricks on them and prevent them from choosing the best candidate.
A recruiter’s ability to remember a candidate they interviewed will depend on factors not related to the person’s qualities for the job. If eight people were interviewed in one day, the first two and the last two may be much easier to recall than the four in the middle. The last candidate in particular may be a recruiter’s favourite for the sole reason that it’s easier for them to remember the interview. Also you may evaluate more favourably a candidate who you have already seen at a job fair or a conference (mere-exposure effect). Or you may let first impressions matter disproportionately: if the candidate was a few minutes late, he/she can’t be serious.
How can it be overcome?
Once you understand the influence that memory biases can have on your recruitment decisions, you may consider designing a recruitment process that can neutralise some of these biases. If you see several candidates in the course of the same day, it is critical to rely on structured interviews during which each candidate is asked the exact same questions as the other candidates. To find out more on the subject of structured interviews, check our “must-read” article about Who: The A Method for Hiring by Geoff Smart and Randy Street
It is essential to systematically record every piece of relevant information during and after each interview. Don’t trust your memory. Don’t wait until you can “see the whole picture”. And don’t rely on your “gut feelings”. If you see 8 candidates in one day, pay extra attention to those “in the middle”, as you are more likely to remember the first and the last.
More inspiration: Laetitia Vitaud
Future of work author and speaker
Why “bring me solutions, not problems” is a terrible corporate phrase
Future of work expert Laetitia Vitaud takes a swing at a classic (and toxic) part of the managerial dictionary
Feb 23, 2023
What a dash of laziness can do for you
It would never occur to us to criticize an animal for needing sleep, so why do we judge each other so harshly?
Jan 05, 2023
Top Gun: An anti-ageist movie? Not exactly…
The blockbuster sequel shows the cognitive dissonance between what we say about valuing experience and the reality of our workplaces
Oct 06, 2022
Here’s why you don’t need to be irreplaceable at work
Do we want to be considered irreplaceable at work? Sure, it might give us a confidence boost in the moment, but is it worth it in the long run?
Sep 07, 2022
Is period leave really a good idea?
The debate over menstrual leave is growing louder in the US, but is it really a progressive policy?
Jul 27, 2022
Inside the jungle: the HR newsletter
Studies, events, expert analysis, and solutions... Every 2 weeks in your inbox
Are you proud of your corporate culture?
Give it the visibility it deserves.Our solutions